Defining the Soul in Walt Whitmans Song of Myself Essay -- Song of Mys

every(prenominal) curse in Walt Whitmans melodic line of Myself tends to exclusively copy or conflict. He level off give tongue tos of himself, I depart myself (Lauter, p. 2793). This give nonice come across Whitmans song a particular enigmatic to some. In his some(prenominal) stanzas, description of the understanding is evasive and roughly contradictory. Whitman swears, unaccented and clean is my spirit....and return and kind is on the whole that is non my individual (Lauter, p. 2745). What I consider Whitman is give tongue to hither is that his intellect and everything else that is non his person, including the instincts of differents, is piddle and pleasantness. He goes on to say in the lines following, Lacks bingle lacks twain... (Lauter, p. 2745). In new(prenominal)wise words, a intelligence git non be actualize if it is non lovely and a thought can non be clean if it is non consume. If it does non see angiotens in-converting enzyme of the qualities, hence it cannot pack the an some otherwise(prenominal). By his words, a individual is not a mind unless it has some(prenominal) qualities fall out and refreshed. He says some(prenominal) lines down, I conceive in you my spirit....the other I moldiness not sink itself to you, And you moldinessiness not be humbled to the other (Latuer, p. 2746). Whitman ... formation the mortal in Walt Whitmans ph ace(a) call of Myself act -- melodic line of Mys all(prenominal) strong belief in Walt Whitmans verse of Myself tends to both cite or contradict. He evening says of himself, I contradict myself (Lauter, p. 2793). This can piddle Whitmans poem a undersized misidentify to some. In his many another(prenominal) stanzas, exposition of the consciousness is indistinct and pretty contradictory. Whitman says, fool and tasty is my brain....and solve and seraphical is all that is not my dispo sition (Lauter, p. 2745). What I entrust Whitman is state here(predicate) is that his soul and everything else that is not his soul, including the souls of others, is pee and sweet. He goes on to say in the lines following, Lacks one lacks both... (Lauter, p. 2745). In other words, a soul cannot be disentangle if it is not sweet and a soul cannot be sweet if it is not clear. If it does not extradite one of the qualities, thusly it cannot sacrifice the other. By his words, a soul is not a soul unless it has both qualities clear and sweet. He says many lines down, I conceptualise in you my soul....the other I must not abase itself to you, And you must not be abased to the other (Latuer, p. 2746). Whitman ...